Linda Hirshman = My Mother
Last night, as I drifted off to sleep, my Linda Hirshman post still fresh in my mind, I had a revelation.
Readers of this blog, remember this conversation last week?
Remember these lines?
DAD: " We didn`t send you to college so you could sit around on your ass."
MOM: "Remember, Mrs. A. next door? She sat around on her ass all day long. You`re just like her now."
ME: "Yes, I know, Mom. Mrs. A. went to PTA meetings and sat by her pool during the day, while you worked to save money to send us to college."
I wondered why Hirshman no longer makes me angry, and the answer is, she`s attacking the places on me that already have a thick layer of scar tissue, from decades of my parents` stinging barbs.
Linda Hirshman is a feminist of my mother`s generation, the generation that fought their way into a man`s world, tooth and nail. No wonder she`s upset that lots of young women didn`t want to follow them.
Here is my mother`s story: her parents refused to give her any money for college, because they said they needed to save for her younger brother`s education. ("Boys need to go to college, but girls don`t, because their husbands take care of them," they said.) So she went to a small Catholic women`s college in Hartford, and paid for it entirely herself. She took a "baby break" for a few years when my younger brother and I were small, but returned to work fulltime at an insurance company when he started kindergarten. She worked fulltime until she retired, endured sexist bosses and overt discrimination, went to night school to study computers and get an MBA, and ended up making more than my father.
And my dad? He was raised by a traditional mother who did all the cooking and housework, but when my mom went back to work, he picked up a vacuum cleaner. He did the grocery shopping. I don`t remember his doing laundry, but I do remember seeing him washing the kitchen floor at night. And after my mother developed a severe chronic knee problem, he actually did more of the physical tasks around the house than she did.
Our house was not a feminist utopia, however, because there was a hostile neighborhood outside. When I was growing up, my mother was one of the only working-outside-the-home mothers in our neighborhood. My grandmother lived with us and worked nights as a waitress, so my parents never had to worry about daytime childcare. But still, I know what the stay-at-home mothers said about my mother, because I overheard some of it when I was playing at their houses:
"Her kids aren`t important enough to her to raise them herself!"
"She never volunteers for anything. Her job comes first!"
Many of the mothers in our neighborhood looked down on my mother, and my mother in turn looked down on them, and ridiculed them as brainless Stepford wives who sat by their pools all day. (We didn`t have a pool. Even if we could afford one, I`m sure my parents would have refused to put one in on principle, because pools were a symbol of the lazy lifestyle they abhorred.)
So now that I`ve become one of these women, in my mother`s eyes, it`s no surprise that she needles me about it. My choices are clearly an affront to her own. I have joined the enemy.
Thanks to one of my commenters below, I found an excerpt from Hirshman`s book. Go to page two -- she says this:
In response to my recent article on the subject, BloggingBaby.com (a Web site that advertises baby care, baby products, maternity clothes, etc.) solicited stories of stay-at-home moms, apparently thinking their reports would rebut my work. The BloggingBaby.com mothers do not for the most part appear to be the same socioeconomic class that the Times brides are, so the seven profiles published in December and January make a little picture of how regular people behave. Surprise! The statistics are identical: Three of the seven moms don't work at all, three have part-time jobs at increasing distances from their education and training, and one works full time at what she was educated for.
I wrote one of those Blogging Baby profiles, but I don`t know if Hirshman read it. There were actually eleven profiles, not seven, counting the two written by Blogging Baby`s paid bloggers. She quotes from a few of them, but not from mine.
Even if she did read mine, I surely don`t fit any definition of "regular people," because I`m married to a foreign government official, and have a back-and-forth life between two countries. I`m fortunate that my field -- journalism -- is one that can accomodate our unsettled life, and I have no doubt that I will be able to find a fulltime job again someday. Whether it`s a satisfying job is another story, but that`s never guaranteed, no matter what course my life takes.
Anyway, back to my family.
My grandmother, the one who initially objected to my mother`s college plans, ironically was the one who taught me the importance of self-reliance, which she belatedly learned herself. She was a waitress all her life -- she had wanted to be a nurse, but had to leave school and go to work during the Depression, so she never finished high school. When my mother was a senior in college, her father suddenly died of a cerebral aneurysm when he was 50 and my grandmother was 45.
"Never completely depend on a man," Gramma told me. "Even if you find the perfect husband, he could die."
So we`ve always had life insurance and a "what if" plan, in our family.
The other example that made an impression on me is the case of a friend of my father`s, who lived in our neighborhood and had a similar job at the same insurance company.
My father never enjoyed his job as an insurance underwiter -- it was just something he did to pay the bills and save money for the future. Now he and my mother are living it up in their senior community outside of Las Vegas, truly having the time of their lives.
But his friend died of cancer a few months after retiring. It occurred to me, that could have been my dad. He (or my mom) could have worked hard all his life at a job he didn`t like, and never gotten his delayed gratification.
This is where that maligned "choice" feminism comes in: satisfaction really matters to my generation, both men and women alike. We understand our responsibilities and our goals, but we want to enjoy the journey there as much as we can, too. We want to do what makes us happiest, because life is short and babies grow up so quickly. This is entirely personal, and therefore selfish by definition. No wonder Hirshman thinks we`re failures to her cause.
Overall, I`m not sure Hirshman`s book ("Get to Work: A Manifesto for Women of the World") is going to motivate any of us stay-at-home mothers to get off our lazy asses, put our kids in daycare and heed the clarion call of old-style feminism.
If the success rate of my mother`s nagging is any indication, I wouldn`t count on it.
Readers of this blog, remember this conversation last week?
Remember these lines?
DAD: " We didn`t send you to college so you could sit around on your ass."
MOM: "Remember, Mrs. A. next door? She sat around on her ass all day long. You`re just like her now."
ME: "Yes, I know, Mom. Mrs. A. went to PTA meetings and sat by her pool during the day, while you worked to save money to send us to college."
I wondered why Hirshman no longer makes me angry, and the answer is, she`s attacking the places on me that already have a thick layer of scar tissue, from decades of my parents` stinging barbs.
Linda Hirshman is a feminist of my mother`s generation, the generation that fought their way into a man`s world, tooth and nail. No wonder she`s upset that lots of young women didn`t want to follow them.
Here is my mother`s story: her parents refused to give her any money for college, because they said they needed to save for her younger brother`s education. ("Boys need to go to college, but girls don`t, because their husbands take care of them," they said.) So she went to a small Catholic women`s college in Hartford, and paid for it entirely herself. She took a "baby break" for a few years when my younger brother and I were small, but returned to work fulltime at an insurance company when he started kindergarten. She worked fulltime until she retired, endured sexist bosses and overt discrimination, went to night school to study computers and get an MBA, and ended up making more than my father.
And my dad? He was raised by a traditional mother who did all the cooking and housework, but when my mom went back to work, he picked up a vacuum cleaner. He did the grocery shopping. I don`t remember his doing laundry, but I do remember seeing him washing the kitchen floor at night. And after my mother developed a severe chronic knee problem, he actually did more of the physical tasks around the house than she did.
Our house was not a feminist utopia, however, because there was a hostile neighborhood outside. When I was growing up, my mother was one of the only working-outside-the-home mothers in our neighborhood. My grandmother lived with us and worked nights as a waitress, so my parents never had to worry about daytime childcare. But still, I know what the stay-at-home mothers said about my mother, because I overheard some of it when I was playing at their houses:
"Her kids aren`t important enough to her to raise them herself!"
"She never volunteers for anything. Her job comes first!"
Many of the mothers in our neighborhood looked down on my mother, and my mother in turn looked down on them, and ridiculed them as brainless Stepford wives who sat by their pools all day. (We didn`t have a pool. Even if we could afford one, I`m sure my parents would have refused to put one in on principle, because pools were a symbol of the lazy lifestyle they abhorred.)
So now that I`ve become one of these women, in my mother`s eyes, it`s no surprise that she needles me about it. My choices are clearly an affront to her own. I have joined the enemy.
Thanks to one of my commenters below, I found an excerpt from Hirshman`s book. Go to page two -- she says this:
In response to my recent article on the subject, BloggingBaby.com (a Web site that advertises baby care, baby products, maternity clothes, etc.) solicited stories of stay-at-home moms, apparently thinking their reports would rebut my work. The BloggingBaby.com mothers do not for the most part appear to be the same socioeconomic class that the Times brides are, so the seven profiles published in December and January make a little picture of how regular people behave. Surprise! The statistics are identical: Three of the seven moms don't work at all, three have part-time jobs at increasing distances from their education and training, and one works full time at what she was educated for.
I wrote one of those Blogging Baby profiles, but I don`t know if Hirshman read it. There were actually eleven profiles, not seven, counting the two written by Blogging Baby`s paid bloggers. She quotes from a few of them, but not from mine.
Even if she did read mine, I surely don`t fit any definition of "regular people," because I`m married to a foreign government official, and have a back-and-forth life between two countries. I`m fortunate that my field -- journalism -- is one that can accomodate our unsettled life, and I have no doubt that I will be able to find a fulltime job again someday. Whether it`s a satisfying job is another story, but that`s never guaranteed, no matter what course my life takes.
Anyway, back to my family.
My grandmother, the one who initially objected to my mother`s college plans, ironically was the one who taught me the importance of self-reliance, which she belatedly learned herself. She was a waitress all her life -- she had wanted to be a nurse, but had to leave school and go to work during the Depression, so she never finished high school. When my mother was a senior in college, her father suddenly died of a cerebral aneurysm when he was 50 and my grandmother was 45.
"Never completely depend on a man," Gramma told me. "Even if you find the perfect husband, he could die."
So we`ve always had life insurance and a "what if" plan, in our family.
The other example that made an impression on me is the case of a friend of my father`s, who lived in our neighborhood and had a similar job at the same insurance company.
My father never enjoyed his job as an insurance underwiter -- it was just something he did to pay the bills and save money for the future. Now he and my mother are living it up in their senior community outside of Las Vegas, truly having the time of their lives.
But his friend died of cancer a few months after retiring. It occurred to me, that could have been my dad. He (or my mom) could have worked hard all his life at a job he didn`t like, and never gotten his delayed gratification.
This is where that maligned "choice" feminism comes in: satisfaction really matters to my generation, both men and women alike. We understand our responsibilities and our goals, but we want to enjoy the journey there as much as we can, too. We want to do what makes us happiest, because life is short and babies grow up so quickly. This is entirely personal, and therefore selfish by definition. No wonder Hirshman thinks we`re failures to her cause.
Overall, I`m not sure Hirshman`s book ("Get to Work: A Manifesto for Women of the World") is going to motivate any of us stay-at-home mothers to get off our lazy asses, put our kids in daycare and heed the clarion call of old-style feminism.
If the success rate of my mother`s nagging is any indication, I wouldn`t count on it.


10 Comments:
I having been thinking a lot about your post on LH yesterday.. I need to read this in closer detail tonight, when i'm home. -- but as to the yo' family, hmmmmmm.. yeah this is an angle!
The angle I was ruminating on last night was about the tension in LH content between her sort of 'legit, quality, mainstream JOURNALIST discourse' VERSUS the silly little blogosphere. What say you on that, madame?
Being a librarian.. being one who worked in a press library and now in school libraries where the paranoia about the 'attack of the Internet' is rampant I wonder about the politics off and on. I tend to use the coffee analogy to reassure people in each industry. Industrial and home solutions do not replace one another... Stop being competitive, petty and afraid. True the MR. COFFEE had a few good years replacing the perk but many many coffee shops did hold on.. and now? Well I swear Mr Coffee practically led to the boutique commodification of coffee houses, from Starbuck to Corner Jerk!
In the library end I call this bibliodiversity.
But back to my question: Do you find any thread of inter-media attacks (e.g. anti-blog) in the regurgitation of Hirshman's minted opinion?
Or is it just me... ?
And on the Mom and Pop, I'll try to put a more cohesive comment together after a closer read.
Yer wearin' me out!
ps.. you know I actually do have email on my chosen identity now you know, secret one.
So, I've been reading various other bloggers commenting on the Hirshman Op-Ed and the thing that strikes me as sad (but I've yet to see anyone objecting to it) is that she seems to declare uneducated people, and by that we assume non-college-educated people, as second-class citizens. I'm not even sure I have the right to be upset about it since I do hold a BA...but my mom doesn't. Hell, I'm not even sure she graduated from the South Korean equivalent of High School. However, she is pulling down more money than any other working woman I personally know. She owns her own corporation, retail properties, and business...she even employs her own husband. And yet, my mother apparently doesn't qualify in Hirshman's mind as being too important to stay home and raise children (which she did before she decided to take over her part of the US.)
And then, there's the other part of the question that her statement raises...if a woman's education level means that she shouldn't stay home to raise children and we assumed that the ultimate goal is to get all women a BA, at least...then eventually, someone with only a BA is going to be delegated to second-class citizen level simply because too many other have a MA or PhD. How long until day care workers will be required to have a MA in Child Development before they are allowed to work for a pittance of an hourly wage?
Hirshman simply reinforces the idea that Feminism isn't for all women...only for the wealthy white women.
Whoops, forgot to sign my above comment. :)
- Auntie M
It's that old-school feminist ideal of the professional woman that has me at odds with LH; from what (little) I read in the WP essay, women are either doctors/lawyers/PhDs OR Stepford Wives (not to put too general a slant on her argument), but not administrative assistants or cashiers or any number of non-'professional' workers...
I'm losing my coherence here (not that I had a lot to begin with), but I guess what I'm trying to get at is it surprises me that several decades of developments in feminist theory seem to have passed LH by - ones in which women of different socio-economic, not to mention racial and national, backgrounds have basically said to white women academics, look, you don't speak for me. LH's conception of feminism seems pretty far removed from the directions its gone in since, say, the 1970s, even discounting the byzantine theories of the 'third wave' feminists...
And to hide behind this bogus "when did it become wrong to criticize women" b.s. just seems kind of cowardly to me. I dunno.
You know, I'm over this, but because you get my brain churning, L., here you go...
Why do women have to work in order to improve the working world for women? Maybe that was the case twenty or thirty years ago, but I don't know that women are the ones necessarily making the working world a more woman-friendly, family-friendly place. I can think of tons of asshole old-school feminists who are actually tougher on their younger female employees than male counterparts of a similar age. And I certainly think that men like Dutch and my very awesome husband will be flexible, accomodating employers to women with or without children.
Hirshman's argument might have been relevant in 1973.
I gotta raise a big thanks for your reflection on -- seriously for lack of a better phrase -- sanctified slackerhood we might be embracing for a while. I agree entirely that part of my attraction to motherhood at the distraction from work is the pursuit of satisfaction, yes.
I do think the gap between feminist generations here is valid.
I can add as well that I look at all the choices I have around working and you know what else sticks out for me... I have been working FOREVER. I started regularized employment 12 years ago at age 14. With the exception of a 4month period when we moved for p-mans work I have worked that whole time. From 15 to 20 to 40 to what 65 hours a week at my current job prior to my first kid.
Give me a piece of that selfishness pie, please. And, get thee back to the print mines Ms. Hirshman, your cause is without effect.
ps,, L. I feel like this is our anniversary or something. I do believe that it was this topic that first brought me off lurking status with your great blog those many moons ago.
A question I have is can a book, by a stranger, make you suddenly sit up and change your plans for life? If so, then that's even scarier that one's life plans can be so easily influenced by others.
Get you on the whole scar tissue part. He-he.
I think you hit the nail on the head when you said that satisfaction really matters to our generation.
That type of thinking did not exist in previous generations. Everyone always did what they thought was best for their families, or what they needed to do to get by.
I guess as a result of having a better economy for a couple of decades and as a result of seeing our parents work so hard for seemingly nothing, we've all decided that there is something better in life.
I am really glad about that, but I do remember that it was not always like this, so I try to be thankful for every minute.
Thank you for bringing this story to light for me. Apparently I've been under a rock ... (well, actually, stuck on airplanes from Narita to the US) lately and missed the original news story.
Your post, the ABC news link and the other commenters led me to a total rant - which I placed on my blog so that I wouldn't exceed the length limits in your comment section.
BTW, I love reading your writing. Whether on the economic turnaround in Japan, on how to say "Crazy Rat killing woman" in Mandarin, or on misguided feminism in the media - your blog is amazingly well written and always enlightening.
I love your perspective on this-I think it really is bridging the gap for those of us who can see the other side, but don't agree with it, and simply just want the CHOICE to be who we want/need to be. I'm lucky to have been raised in a family that never really placed to many expectations on my shoulders, but I still put many there all on my own.
Kickass. Thanks.
Post a Comment
<< Home